Community Page
- babygotmac.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- A great iphone app would be that of either one in which a photo of someone could be merged with that of a celeb, this would be ideal for the social networking which is now available to everyone on...
- With the technology changing rapidly, I am not surprised that most of the gadgets are becoming multitasking!
- WOW how COOL I jus WON the IPhone contest :D!!!! now I can get the Rob Thomas app an carry him around in my pocket!!!!!
- I agree - bought my car with built in ipod connector - use it for long road trips - totally unacceptable that ipod did not tell or notify about change in connectors - still using my 1st gen ipod in...
- Thanks for having a great contest! Crossing my fingers that I win...
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
Are you implying that network Time Machine backups are not working properly in 10.5.2? Or just that Air Disks still do not work?
1 year ago
Yes, with no success.
Hmm. Interesting, I'll give that a shot and report back.
I do think it was some clever marketing to make Time Capsule seem more attractive. They underestimate the Mac nerd market though.
:)
Both?
1 year ago
AirPort Extreme doesn't support all the necessary back end components that Time Capsule supports.
I do expect an AirPort Extreme update coming soon... not sure how soon!
1 year ago
Okay, well then you are saying that Apple has broken network backups from 10.5.1 to 10.5.2, which I don't believe.
10.5.1 currently supports using another Leopard machine with an AFP sharepoint as a Time Machine backup location. Without any hacks, you can setup a share on any Leopard machine and mount that share with another Leopard machine and use that to backup to.
There is this big confusion that network Time Machine backup is broken in 10.5.1. It isn't.
1 year ago
I'll have to check on another machine tonight, but I seem to recall that the only way to backup to a shared drive is with a hack (either this line: defaults write com.apple.systempreferences TMShowUnsupportedNetworkVolumes 1 or a method like this one: http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/10/12595/ ).
Again, not positive and can't test right now, but it almost certainly doesn't work 'out of the box'. Are you sure you didn't use an app like iTimeMachine at some point?
1 year ago
1 year ago
100% sure no hacks took place.
In 10.5.0, if the volume you were backing up to wasn't as large or larger than the volume, Time Machine would complain that there wasn't enough space. Now in 10.5.1, you can use Time Machine to backup the current data to a drive if the data currently on the volume you want to backup, is less than the volume you are backing up to.
What's more, is that Time Machine also respects quotas. I have setup a 10.5.1 client with a couple sharepoints, and multiple users with quotas on that volume, then if a machine wants to use a sharepoint as their backup, it will do so, up to the quota that I defined.
1 year ago
1 year ago
Okay, well then you are saying that Apple has broken network backups from 10.5.1 to 10.5.2, which I don’t believe.
10.5.1 currently supports using another Leopard machine with an AFP sharepoint as a Time Machine backup location. Without any hacks, you can setup a share on any Leopard machine and mount that share with another Leopard machine and use that to backup to.
There is this big confusion that network Time Machine backup is broken in 10.5.1. It isn’t.
I don't think anyone is saying that network backups are broken in 10.5.1 as they are not, there is a document on the apple site about it detailing what is required for it to work.
What is broken that was in the Leopard GM is backup to NAS (AFP/FAT/SMB/HFS, whatever) and none Leopard hosted network drives, like windows servers at the office mounted over SMB. If you want to do network backups in 10.5.1, it has to be to another Mac running Leopard or Leopard Server.
This is where the confusion lies, in the definition of network drives.
1 year ago
It is godawful slow(~5 hrs to do the initial 80GB of backup), but the fact that it will regularly update without having a dangling USB anchor on it works great.
1 year ago
Hmm. Interesting, I’ll give that a shot and report back.
I would love to see if you have any luck with this. I've hacked my setup and I still have absolutely no luck getting Time Machine to work with an AirDisk at all.
1 year ago
I replaced my D link router with a airport extreme (one week before I found out about Time Capsule I was kicking my self ) So I plugged the drive into Airport and set up the Ext Disk with password etc. Went back to MBP and repeated what I did with the networked drive and worked just as before. Now with my other mac well i had to do a fresh time machine back up but now both are working off the AIRPORT disk.
My guess is once time machine activates and identifies a disk it puts a hidden file on the disk that allows it to be used .
When last thing I forgot need to do one terminal command on each machine you want :
defaults write com.apple.systempreferences TMShowUnsupportedNetworkVolumes 1
I hope all this helps
1 year ago
I plugged a 1TB Iomega hard drive to it and, while read performance over the GigE port is mostly OK, write performance sucks. I was never able to get more than 2-5 MB/s when doing random writes, no matter I used AFP or SMB. Now I have the same drive plugged to a Linux box over FireWire 400 and I get 20 MB/s while doing random writes over NFS.
What I find annoying is that I think AirPort Extreme mounts the USB disk in write-through mode instead of write-back, mostly because you can unplug the hard disk without having to tell the base station. Additionally, even with the latest firmware, the base station has crashed while doing heavy I/O.
So, I'm done with Apple attempts at making cheap file servers. I'm now happily using an NFS-based Linux file server which support Kerberos and single sign-on and has much better reliability and stability than the AirPort Extreme.
1 year ago
I had no problems getting TM to recognize my AEBS as an Airport Disk, but the initial backup (100 GB) took 80 HOURS, and I saw no improvement with the speed on subsequent backups.
Maybe it's something in my setup...but regardless, this isn't a solution for me. Not to mention the fact that hacking backup software doesn't strike me as the best of ideas in the first place...
Would love to hear from those who are actively backing up to an AEBS...
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
11 months ago